Mercury contamination : The Synchrotron sheds light thanks to… a hair

sep article



IN SHORT – We know how to detect mercury in organisms, but up to now, we knew less about how to identify the origin of the contamination. Experiments carried out on a hair by a team of international researchers at the European Synchrotron in Grenoble have shed light on these grey areas

 

 

 

Researchers, like Alain Manceau (shown here) have used the Synchrotron light to analyse a human hair, and have traced the origin of mercury contamination. © ESRF

Researchers, like Alain Manceau (shown here) have used the Synchrotron light to ana­lyse a human hair, and have tra­ced the ori­gin of mer­cury conta­mi­na­tion. © ESRF

Mercury is found in fish or rice, in den­tal amal­gam, some vac­cines and also in medi­cines.

 

Even though we know how to detect this power­ful neu­ro­toxin, which accu­mu­lates in orga­nisms, nota­bly through urine ana­ly­sis, iden­ti­fying the source of conta­mi­na­tion with mer­cury toxi­co­logy risk assess­ment and imple­men­ting a treat­ment, has always been rela­ti­vely hazar­dous.

 

Researchers from the CNRS, the University of Bordeaux, the Grenoble Alpes University, the ESRF, the European syn­chro­tron in Grenoble and the University of Illinois in Chicago have just found the solu­tion by deve­lo­ping new tech­niques of ana­ly­sis to iden­tify the che­mi­cal forms of mer­cury *.

 

Using two lines of syn­chro­tron light from the ESRF, they dis­co­ve­red that a spike in mer­cury, obser­ved on a hair, came from the remo­val of den­tal amal­gam. Experiments conduc­ted in Grenoble can even date the expo­sure per­iod to within one or two days.

 

Indeed, with an ave­rage growth rate of one cen­ti­metre per month, hair can cap­ture events of conta­mi­na­tion with high tem­po­ral reso­lu­tion ; a key wit­ness, which has sha­ken a few cer­tain­ties.

 

 

From mercury, to other toxic metals ?

 

 

“The epi­de­mio­lo­gi­cal stu­dies of conta­mi­na­tion with mer­cury by eating fish make the hypo­the­sis that mer­cury in hair comes only from this source”, explains Kathryn Nagy, Professor of Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois in Chicago. “Our results show that this is not neces­sa­rily true.”

 

“We did not expect to find that the micro­sco­pic peak of mer­cury, at just 2.5 nano­grammes, has a dif­ferent mole­cu­lar signa­ture from that of methyl­mer­cury, which is rela­ted to fish consump­tion”, conti­nues Alain Manceau, Director of research at the CNRS-University Grenoble Alpes. “However, to ensure that the mer­cury came from amal­gam, it was essen­tial to know its mole­cu­lar form, and espe­cially how it was atta­ched to pro­teins in the hair. This, tho­rough inves­ti­ga­tive work has taken seve­ral months and requi­red the use of super­com­pu­ters to model the data.”

 

 

Patricia Cerinsek

 

 

* The results have been publi­shed in the Environmental Science & Technology jour­nal.

 

Traduction from Speak English Center

Phone : +33 4 76 50 39 79

1 ave­nue du Vercors, 38600 Fontaine FRANCE

 

Festival du film France Nature Environnement
commentez lire les commentaires
2207 visites | 0 réaction
logos commentaires logos commentaires

Commentez ou réagissez

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.

Votre commentaire sera publié dans les plus brefs délais, après modération.